I should defend the interests of the company and are in a neutral party between the company and employees. but this is a wedge heart and seemed contradictory. I do have to be a pawn in the company, but I myself was not an official part of the company because I'm only borrowing.
as if only an item on loan and can be discharged at any time, so I'm not bound by my own company. it is a problem, when I have to defend the interests of the company but I'm not part of them. I like the circle is outside the circle.
the difference was like I felt and somewhat explained, among permanent employees or contract directly with outsourch. of the uniform we were wearing outsourch name beside the name of his company.
the difference was like I felt and somewhat explained, among permanent employees or contract directly with outsourch. of the uniform we were wearing outsourch name beside the name of his company.
ought to outsource the company's contract but the contract immediately abolished. because of the commission given money to outsource the company is better given to the employee. commission taken by the outsourch usually at least 30% of take home pay of employees.
not a bad number if given to the employee and can increase income for outsourced employees. or may the facilities provided, if the employee who provided the insurance company directly from the class that can go into the hospital level, but what happened to outsource only secured by JPK that his level of health centers only if the hospital would be rejected, the process is long-winded and others.
I am so sorry to be employees of the outsourcing but not with the work I do. if indeed there is no change for the future, sorry I have to go from this company.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar